Bayesian models of multisensory perception traditionally address the problem of estimating an underlying variable that is assumed to be the cause of the two sen- sory signals. The brain, however, has to solve a more general problem: it also has to establish which signals come from the same source and should be integrated, and which ones do not and should be segregated. In the last couple of years, a few models have been proposed to solve this problem in a Bayesian fashion. One of these has the strength that it formalizes the causal structure of sensory signals. We first compare these models on a formal level.

We explore a recently proposed mixture model approach to understand- ing interactions between conflicting sensory cues. Alternative model for- mulations, differing in their sensory noise models and inference methods, are compared based on their fit to experimental data. Heavy-tailed sen- sory likelihoods yield a better description of the subjects' response behavior than standard Gaussian noise models. We study the underlying cause for this result, and then present several testable predictions of these models.

Imagine you are savoring tea in a peaceful Zen garden: a robot sees your empty cup and starts pouring, hears the increase of the sound pitch as the water level rises in the cup, and feels with its fingers around the handle of the teapot to tell how much tea is left and control the pouring speed. For both humans and robots, multisensory perception with vision, audio, and touch plays a crucial role in everyday tasks: vision reliably captures the global setup, audio sends immediate alerts even for occluded events, and touch provides precise local geometry of objects that reveal their status. Though exciting progress has been made on teaching robots to tackle various tasks [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], limited prior work has combined multiple sensory modalities for robot learning. There have been some recent attempts that use audio [6, 7, 8, 9] or touch [10, 11, 12, 13, 14] in conjunction with vision for robot perception, but no prior work has simultaneously incorporated visual, acoustic, and tactile signals--three principal sensory modalities, and study their respective roles on challenging multisensory robotic manipulation tasks. We aim to demonstrate the benefit of fusing multiple sensory modalities for solving complex robotic manipulation tasks, and to provide an in-depth study of the characteristics of each modality and how they complement each other.

He also shares his experience about using robotics for K-12 education. Jivko Sinapov received his Ph.D. in Computer Science and Human-Computer Interaction from Iowa State University (ISU). While working toward his Ph.D. at ISU's Developmental Robotics Lab, he developed novel methods for behavioral object exploration and multi-modal perception. He went on to be a clinical assistant professor with the Texas Institute for Discovery, Education, and Science at UT Austin and a postdoctoral associate working with Peter Stone at the Artificial Intelligence lab. Sinapov's research interests include developmental robotics, computational perception, autonomous manipulation, and human-robot interaction.

Bayesian models of multisensory perception traditionally address the problem of estimating an underlying variable that is assumed to be the cause of the two sensory signals. The brain, however, has to solve a more general problem: it also has to establish which signals come from the same source and should be integrated, and which ones do not and should be segregated. In the last couple of years, a few models have been proposed to solve this problem in a Bayesian fashion. One of these has the strength that it formalizes the causal structure of sensory signals. We first compare these models on a formal level. Furthermore, we conduct a psychophysics experiment to test human performance in an auditory-visual spatial localization task in which integration is not mandatory. We find that the causal Bayesian inference model accounts for the data better than other models.

Bayesian models of multisensory perception traditionally address the problem of estimating an underlying variable that is assumed to be the cause of the two sensory signals. The brain, however, has to solve a more general problem: it also has to establish which signals come from the same source and should be integrated, and which ones do not and should be segregated. In the last couple of years, a few models have been proposed to solve this problem in a Bayesian fashion. One of these has the strength that it formalizes the causal structure of sensory signals. We first compare these models on a formal level. Furthermore, we conduct a psychophysics experiment to test human performance in an auditory-visual spatial localization task in which integration is not mandatory. We find that the causal Bayesian inference model accounts for the data better than other models.

We first compare these models on a formal level.